Responsible Communication and Marketing in Tourism (3 cr)
Code: PR10003-3003
General information
Enrollment
01.10.2024 - 31.10.2024
Timing
01.04.2025 - 30.05.2025
Number of ECTS credits allocated
3 op
Virtual portion
2 op
Mode of delivery
34 % Contact teaching, 66 % Distance learning
Unit
Restonomikoulutus (PR)
Campus
Wärtsilä Campus Karjalankatu 3
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
20 - 60
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Tourism and Service Business
Teachers
- Tarja Kupiainen
Teacher in charge
Raija Ruusunen
Groups
-
TOP24_25Other Complimentary Studies Group Semester 2024-2025
-
PRAS22Hospitality Management (BA), Tourism and Catering, blended learning, Fall, 2022
Materials
Visit Finland: Tips for Responsible Communication https://m.karelia.fi/pluginfile.php/420523/mod_resource/content/1/tips-for-sustainability-communications-a4_eng_web.pdf
Marketing Sustainable Tourism. https://etc-corporate.org/uploads/2021/02/Tool-14-Knowledge-Booster-2-Marketing-Sustainability.pdf
Teaching methods
This course covers responsible tourism and effective communication. Despite growing interest, information on responsible tourism services is limited, and entrepreneurs struggle to make it appealing to consumers. This poses a challenge for future tourism professionals.
Learning outcomes:
• Understand responsible choices to inform customers.
• Learn about responsible communication in tourism generally.
• Identify the components of responsible communication within the tourism sector.
• Recognize whitewashing and greenwashing in tourism communications.
The main topics include:
• Green Communication & Marketing
• CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) Communication
• Responsible Communication in Rural Tourism
• Cultural Sustainable Communication
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment methods and criteria
In Moodle
Assessment criteria, fail (0)
The learning tasks are not performed according to the instructions given, the coverage is scant and incomplete, confusing or inconsistent, or focuses on irrelevant or irrelevant issues. They demonstrate a poor understanding and control of the issues under consideration.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Objectives partially met. There is some depth and variety in the performance of the learning tasks, but the overall result is confusing. Performance demonstrates understanding of the issues covered.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4)
The objectives have been achieved. There is a significant degree of depth, variety and coherence in the performance of learning tasks. They demonstrate a good understanding and command of the issues covered.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Objectives achieved with distinction. The learning tasks are thorough, varied, logical, coherent, in-depth and critical. They demonstrate a strong understanding of the issues covered.