Value Management (2 cr)
Code: YT10002-3003
General information
Enrollment
15.08.2024 - 13.09.2024
Timing
29.08.2024 - 11.10.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
2 op
Virtual portion
2 op
Mode of delivery
Distance learning
Campus
Wärtsilä Campus Karjalankatu 3
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
15 - 60
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Business Management and Leadership
- Degree Programme in Technology Competence Management
Teachers
- Jyri Roihuvuo
Teacher in charge
Jyri Roihuvuo
Groups
-
LJYS24Master of Business Administration, Business Management and Leadership, Fall, 2024
-
ITYS24Engineer (MEng), Technology Competence Management, Fall, 2024
Objective
The student will understand the corporate culture and the company's value base for the importance of customer relationships, organizational and personnel management. The student is able to assess the current state of development of the interaction between them. Students are familiar with a variety of leadership styles and how to recognize their own governance-related beliefs. Students are able to analyze different management styles, strengths in different operational environments.
Content
People, work and knowledge as different dimensions of management
Personal development in leadership and management
Management behavior and interaction
Management models and theories
Organisational culture and management culture
Location and time
6.9.2024 ja 13.9.2024, Zoom
Materials
The learning material is available on Moodle.
Teaching methods
Two distance learning days and related learning tasks.
Completion alternatives
You can participate in the teaching remotely in the Zoom application or on site, or you can listen to the recordings of the teaching days afterwards.
Student workload
Distance education 16 h, learning tasks 38 h
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
In the approved task, the selected work community has been analyzed in terms of all tasks. Organizational culture has been described using Hofstede's concepts. Management situations have been described with sufficient accuracy and have been analyzed. A personal reflection is conveyed to the reader.
The answer evaluated for completion has major shortcomings in one of the analysis aspects. The analysis is superficial or one-sided, and there is no self-reflection.
Evaluation scale
Approved/Rejected
Assessment methods and criteria
The evaluation is based on the learning tasks on the scale passed/failed.