Forestry English for Working Life (3 cr)
Code: BIM6010-3006
General information
Enrollment
01.10.2023 - 31.10.2023
Timing
15.01.2024 - 30.04.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
3 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Campus
Wärtsilä Campus Karjalankatu 3
Teaching languages
- Finnish
- English
Seats
20 - 70
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Forestry
Teachers
- Liisa Sandvall
Teacher in charge
Liisa Sandvall
Groups
-
MMNS21Forestry Engineer, Full-time Studies, Fall, 2021
Objective
You are able to communicate orally and in writing in working life situations, for example in negotiations and meetings. You manage documents related to job applications. You deepen your knowledge of professional forestry English and are able to explain forest management practices in Finland and environmentally friendly forest management principles both orally and in writing. You are able to use forest related literature to increase your professional knowledge.
Content
Job application and CV, job interview, working environment of forestry, negotiation skills, meeting practices.
Material packages: Forestry in Finland and Managing the Forest Environment in Finland.
Teaching methods
Teaching takes place on the Wärtsilä campus as contact teaching in accordance with the timetable.
You will be able to communicate orally and in writing in different work situations, such as telephone conversations and meetings. You will be able to manage job application documents. You will deepen your knowledge of the professional language of forestry and be able to communicate orally and in writing about forestry practices and forest management. You will be able to use relevant literature to increase your knowledge in your field. You will be introduced to reporting and the basics of academic writing.
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, fail (0)
Written performance is failed if.
- The competence does not meet the criteria for grade 1.
- The text is not the author's own but has been copied or produced by a translation machine.
Oral performance is fail if the competence does not meet the criteria for grade 1.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Written communication 1: The developing communicator
- The topic has been covered in line with the terms of reference, but in a rather limited and one-sided way.
- The text is sometimes illogical and sentences are disjointed.
- There is little consideration of the reader and the situation (style and expressions).
- The message is conveyed, although linguistic expressions are simple and errors occur
- Satisfactory finishing of the text (proofreading, layout, titling, references where appropriate).
- Good ability to make use of aids to support writing (dictionaries, proofreading).
Oral communication 1: The emerging communicator
- Can communicate in most common situations, including work-related situations, and has a command of the basic vocabulary required in these situations.
- gives a prepared and comprehensible presentation on a professional topic of interest to him/her, even if the speech may be unstructured and illogical. He/she can use self-prepared materials to support his/her speech.
- can participate meaningfully in a discussion, although he/she may need the support of the interlocutors.
- can adapt one's expression to some extent to the situation/ can take account of the requirements of the situation.
- can pronounce intelligibly, although there may be some fumbling and some speech may not be entirely fluent.
- uses the basic structures of the language (singular and plural distinctions, verb tenses, pronouns s/he/they), but these may be incomplete and interfere with the message.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4)
Written communication 3: A good communicator
A good communicator.
The text progresses reasonably logically, but there are minor weaknesses in coherence (paragraphing, cohesion).
Minor stylistic errors may occur. The text is largely reader-friendly, but the level of competence of the expected reader is not always taken into account (e.g. definition of terms).
The language is fairly fluent, clear and relatively error-free. Errors may occur in the more complex structures and expressions. Sentence structures and vocabulary are fairly adequate to convey the message.
The text is well finished (proofreading, layout, titling, references where appropriate).
Excellent ability to use tools to support writing (dictionaries, proofreading).
3: Good oral communicator
- Can communicate well in normal work-related situations and has a good command of the vocabulary required in such situations.
- gives a well-prepared, fluent and structured presentation on a professional topic of interest.
- May need to use self-prepared materials to support one's speech.
- can contribute meaningfully to a discussion and justify his/her position.
- be able to adapt his/her expression to the situation and take account of the requirements of the situation.
- Speaks fluently and at a normal rate. Speech stress and intonation support comprehension.
- uses basic language structures with varying degrees of fluency.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
5: Excellent communicator
- The subject matter is varied and skillful and fully corresponds to the assignment. The text is structurally very clear, logical, coherent and varied.
- The student is able to convey the message in a natural and relevant style, taking into account the target audience.
- The student is able to use written sources as appropriate to the situation and task to support the production of one's own text.
- The student's own written output is fluent and uses aids judiciously.
- The language is very fluent and varied. There is a variety of sentence structures and an excellent command of vocabulary. Occasional errors may occur in the more demanding structures and expressions, but these do not lead to misunderstandings.
- The text is excellently finished (proofreading, layout, titling, references where appropriate).
- The author is able to convince the reader of his expertise.
5: Excellent oral communicator
- Can communicate fluently in work-related situations, including those of a more demanding nature, and has a good command of the specific vocabulary needed to communicate in the field.
- Can give a prepared, fluent and structured presentation on a professional topic. The use of any supporting material does not distract from the presentation itself.
- be able to contribute meaningfully to a discussion and to lead and argue a point of view.
- can fluently adapt his/her expression to the situation and respond naturally to the demands of the situation.
- Speaks fluently and at a normal rate of speech. Speech stress and intonation support comprehension.
- uses language with variety and nuance.