Opinto-opas

Tavoitteet

After completing this module, the student acknowledges national, linguistic, political, ethnic and religious multiplicity in society and she/he is able to pay attention to the dialogue between different worldviews. She/He is also able to conceptualize cultural understanding and cultural sensitivity and is able to pay attention to cultural sensitivity in her/his own work.

Sisältö

Cultural diversity in societyCultural diversity sections and their embodimentsDialogue between worldviewsCultural understanding and cultural sensitivity in a work setting

Aika ja paikka

Kick-off seminar (2 h), concluding seminar (2 h), Independent studying 131 h.

Aikataulu WebOodissa: https://weboodi.uef.fi/weboodi/opettaptied.jsp?OpetTap=76446714&html=1

Student´s workload totally 135 h (5x27h).
Contact teaching, learning assignments and essays.

Oppimateriaalit

Oppimateriaali saatavilla oppimisympäristössä.

Opetusmenetelmät

After completing this module, the student acknowledges national, linguistic, political, ethnic and religious multiplicity in society and she/he is able to pay attention to the dialogue between different worldviews. She/He is also able to conceptualize cultural understanding and cultural sensitivity and is able to pay attention to cultural sensitivity in her/his own work.

Content

Cultural diversity in society
Cultural diversity sections and their embodiments
Dialogue between worldviews
Cultural understanding and cultural sensitivity in a work setting
Contact teaching, learning assignments and essays.
This course is organized with the University of Eastern Finland.

Risto Aikonen (risto.aikonen@uef.fi)
To enroll, pleas use the UEF form: https://link.webropolsurveys.com/S/E9C2101C2837BA96


The teacher will send further instructions to registered students.

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

Kick-off seminar (2 h), concluding seminar (2 h), independent study 131 h.Student´s total workload 135 h (5x27h)

Lisätietoja opiskelijoille

Written learning assignments in the online learning environment. 0-5.

Arviointiasteikko

H-5

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

Written learning assignments in the online learning environment. 0-5.

Hylätty (0)

0 = Fail (blank in the grades table)
Presentation of inappropriate concepts or models or principles or other knowledge and inappropriate arguments and conclusions. Use of inappropriate references. Study process / written assignment does not demonstrate critical thinking and activity and/or does not follow assignment instructions.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2)

1 = Accepted/ Passed
Presentation of only few concepts or models or principles or other knowledge of the topic, as well as few arguments and conclusions. Use of only some topical references. Study process / written assignment demonstrates little critical thinking and activity, although follows assignment instructions.
2 = Satisfactory
Presentation of some of the concepts or models or principles or other knowledge of the topic, as well as some arguments and conclusions. Use of topical references. Study process / written assignment demonstrates little critical thinking and activity, although follows assignment instructions.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4)

3 = Good
Presentation of concepts, models and principles and other knowledge of the topic, as well as coherent and well-grounded arguments, conclusions and reflection. Many-sided use of references. Study process / written assignment demonstrates critical thinking and activity and follows assignment instructions.
4 = Very good
Broad presentation of concepts, models and principles and other knowledge of the topic, as well as coherent and well-grounded arguments, conclusions and reflection. Many-sided and critical use of references. Study process / written assignment demonstrates very good depth and critical thinking and activity and follows assignment instructions.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

5 = Excellent
Broad and deep presentation of concepts, models and principles and other knowledge of the topic, as well as coherent and well-grounded arguments, conclusions and reflection. Many-sided and critical use of references. Study process / written assignment demonstrates excellent in-depth and critical thinking and activity and follows assignment instructions.